Welcome to NEFF

Sign up for a new account today, or log on with your old account!

Give us a try!

Welcome back to the new NEFF. Take a break from Twitter and Facebook. You don't go to Dicks for your fly fishing gear, you go to your local fly fishing store. Enjoy!

NEWS FLASH Don't Count Those Gas Royalties Yet...

If you do the proper research, which I see you haven't, you would know it is not my opinion but a fact from the DEC. Look at the permits and unit designations on the Hancock permit applications and you'll find my statement is based on facts.

Regardless of whether I posted it on a pro or anti gas web site, the obstructionists groups have resricted me or outright banned me from posting the truth, facts are facts and they don't want to hear them, it doesn't fit their agenda.

What facts have you presented???
 
Heres a news article I found. Seems like NYC thurst for gas out weighs its commitment to conservation efforts. What a suprise!!!!

Maybe we just need to import gas for NYC from some hostile country and put a surcharge on it for any resident that uses it. The surcharge can go to those landowners that were denied property rights by the obstructionist through their half truths and misrepresentation of facts to the general population. I forgot to mention, NYC and LI won't allow companies to setup LNG terminals around the metro area for their gas so I guess they'll have to keep drilling domestic supplies of NG justs as long as its not here, NIMBY'ism. See where I'm going with this??

What a bunch of hypocrites. They want their cake and they want to eat it too.

FOX Business.

Monday, December 28, 2009
Chesapeake Energy Corporation Secures New Pipeline Capacity to Expand Natural Gas Market in New York City Metro Area

Comtex

OKLAHOMA CITY, Dec 28, 2009 (BUSINESS WIRE) ----Chesapeake Energy Marketing, Inc., a subsidiary of Chesapeake Energy Corporation (NYSE:CHK), announced today that it has entered into an agreement to be the largest of three anchor shippers on a new Spectra Energy Corp (NYSE:SE) natural gas pipeline project to serve the large and growing New York City metropolitan area natural gas market. Spectra Energy will construct facilities on its Algonquin Gas Transmission and Texas Eastern Transmission pipeline systems, including approximately 16 miles of 30-inch pipeline from Staten Island to Manhattan. Once completed, the pipeline will provide a new interconnect with facilities of Consolidated Edison of New York (NYSE:ED), which will deliver up to 800 million cubic feet per day (mmcf/d) of additional natural gas to Con Edison's service area. Chesapeake is the largest capacity holder with a commitment of up to 425 mmcf/d. The expansion is expected to be in service by year-end 2013.

Aubrey K. McClendon, Chesapeake's Chief Executive Officer, commented, "Chesapeake is pleased to make the commitments necessary to transport our growing Marcellus Shale production into the best natural gas market in the U.S. The relative proximity of abundant Marcellus natural gas reserves to New York City will provide the public, utilities and businesses with a clean-burning alternative to existing dirtier fuel sources. Increased investment in natural gas production and distribution will create tens of thousands of well-paying American jobs in areas that have been suffering economically and will reduce our dependence on expensive foreign oil and other carbon-heavy fuels such as coal. Natural gas provides a cleaner alternative that will reduce greenhouse emissions and improve air quality in the New York City metropolitan area -- a major goal of the city's long-term clean-air initiative.

"With the newfound abundance of domestic natural gas unfolding in many parts of the country through deep shale development, American energy consumers can now more fully embrace the substantial economic and environmental benefits of natural gas," McClendon said.

This is the first major pipeline expansion in the Northeast U.S. that is designed to transport Chesapeake's rapidly expanding Marcellus Shale natural gas production and will likely be followed by other pipeline expansion projects from the Marcellus to other high-value eastern U.S. markets. The New York City metropolitan area is the logical first expanded distribution delivery point for this production based on proximity to the Marcellus and the need for the New York City area to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions and improve air quality by burning less fuel oil in electricity-generating power plants and in building and home furnaces.

Chesapeake believes the Marcellus will become one of the two largest natural gas fields in the U.S., along with the Haynesville Shale. Chesapeake is both the largest leasehold owner and most active driller in both the Marcellus and the Haynesville with more than 1.5 million and 0.5 million net acres owned, respectively, and with 23 and 38 operated rigs currently drilling, respectively.

To date, Chesapeake has invested more than $1.0 billion in acquiring leasehold drilling rights from landowners in New York and Pennsylvania and in 2009 created more than 650 new jobs in Pennsylvania to explore for and develop Marcellus natural gas. The company expects to continue hiring at least 1,000 Pennsylvanians directly and indirectly annually for years to come. The company has no employee hiring plans in New York until the current Marcellus drilling moratorium is lifted.

Although New York Marcellus natural gas volumes will not be required to support the pipeline expansion announced today, McClendon said, "We look forward to the day when we can re-activate our Marcellus drilling program in the Southern Tier of New York using our advanced drilling and completion technologies, which will demonstrate our ability to safely and responsibly explore for and produce natural gas in an environmentally sensitive way, just as we do every day in Pennsylvania and in many other states across the country."

Chesapeake Energy Corporation is one of the leading producers of natural gas in the U.S. Headquartered in Oklahoma City, the company's operations are focused on the development of onshore unconventional and conventional natural gas in the U.S. in the Barnett Shale, Haynesville Shale, Fayetteville Shale, Marcellus Shale, Anadarko Basin, Arkoma Basin, Appalachian Basin, Permian Basin, Delaware Basin, South Texas, Texas Gulf Coast and East Texas regions of the United States. Further information is available at www.chk.com.

SOURCE: Chesapeake Energy Corporation

Chesapeake Energy Corporation
Jeffrey L. Mobley, CFA, 405-767-4763
Senior Vice President --
Investor Relations and Research
jeff.mobley@chk.com
or
Jim Gipson, 405-935-1310
Director -- Media Relations
jim.gipson@chk.com
 
Last edited:
I was skimming thru the latest TU magazine last night and saw an article about the
fracing chemicals showing up in the drinking water. So yeah, I'm afraid where all this
will put us in the future.
Didn't the US govt. state years ago how all the cars would be running gasless by now,
2010 ??
 
I was skimming thru the latest TU magazine last night and saw an article about the
fracing chemicals showing up in the drinking water. So yeah, I'm afraid where all this
will put us in the future.
Didn't the US govt. state years ago how all the cars would be running gasless by now,
2010 ??

If your talking about Wyoming, the EPA has yet to make a determination as to what caused it.

If you have the link I would welcome it.
 
If you do the proper research, which I see you haven't, you would know it is not my opinion but a fact from the DEC. Look at the permits and unit designations on the Hancock permit applications and you'll find my statement is based on facts.

Regardless of whether I posted it on a pro or anti gas web site, the obstructionists groups have resricted me or outright banned me from posting the truth, facts are facts and they don't want to hear them, it doesn't fit their agenda.

What facts have you presented???


I think the facts you presented here speak for themselves. Thank you
 
Last edited:
Heres a news article I found. Seems like NYC thurst for gas out weighs its commitment to conservation efforts. What a suprise!!!!

Maybe we just need to import gas for NYC from some hostile country and put a surcharge on it for any resident that uses it. The surcharge can go to those landowners that were denied property rights by the obstructionist through their half truths and misrepresentation of facts to the general population. I forgot to mention, NYC and LI won't allow companies to setup LNG terminals around the metro area for their gas so I guess they'll have to keep drilling domestic supplies of NG justs as long as its not here, NIMBY'ism. See where I'm going with this??

What a bunch of hypocrites. They want their cake and they want to eat it too.

FOX Business.

Monday, December 28, 2009
Chesapeake Energy Corporation Secures New Pipeline Capacity to Expand Natural Gas Market in New York City Metro Area

Comtex

OKLAHOMA CITY, Dec 28, 2009 (BUSINESS WIRE) ----Chesapeake Energy Marketing, Inc., a subsidiary of Chesapeake Energy Corporation (NYSE:CHK), announced today that it has entered into an agreement to be the largest of three anchor shippers on a new Spectra Energy Corp (NYSE:SE) natural gas pipeline project to serve the large and growing New York City metropolitan area natural gas market. Spectra Energy will construct facilities on its Algonquin Gas Transmission and Texas Eastern Transmission pipeline systems, including approximately 16 miles of 30-inch pipeline from Staten Island to Manhattan. Once completed, the pipeline will provide a new interconnect with facilities of Consolidated Edison of New York (NYSE:ED), which will deliver up to 800 million cubic feet per day (mmcf/d) of additional natural gas to Con Edison's service area. Chesapeake is the largest capacity holder with a commitment of up to 425 mmcf/d. The expansion is expected to be in service by year-end 2013.

Aubrey K. McClendon, Chesapeake's Chief Executive Officer, commented, "Chesapeake is pleased to make the commitments necessary to transport our growing Marcellus Shale production into the best natural gas market in the U.S. The relative proximity of abundant Marcellus natural gas reserves to New York City will provide the public, utilities and businesses with a clean-burning alternative to existing dirtier fuel sources. Increased investment in natural gas production and distribution will create tens of thousands of well-paying American jobs in areas that have been suffering economically and will reduce our dependence on expensive foreign oil and other carbon-heavy fuels such as coal. Natural gas provides a cleaner alternative that will reduce greenhouse emissions and improve air quality in the New York City metropolitan area -- a major goal of the city's long-term clean-air initiative.

"With the newfound abundance of domestic natural gas unfolding in many parts of the country through deep shale development, American energy consumers can now more fully embrace the substantial economic and environmental benefits of natural gas," McClendon said.

This is the first major pipeline expansion in the Northeast U.S. that is designed to transport Chesapeake's rapidly expanding Marcellus Shale natural gas production and will likely be followed by other pipeline expansion projects from the Marcellus to other high-value eastern U.S. markets. The New York City metropolitan area is the logical first expanded distribution delivery point for this production based on proximity to the Marcellus and the need for the New York City area to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions and improve air quality by burning less fuel oil in electricity-generating power plants and in building and home furnaces.

Chesapeake believes the Marcellus will become one of the two largest natural gas fields in the U.S., along with the Haynesville Shale. Chesapeake is both the largest leasehold owner and most active driller in both the Marcellus and the Haynesville with more than 1.5 million and 0.5 million net acres owned, respectively, and with 23 and 38 operated rigs currently drilling, respectively.

To date, Chesapeake has invested more than $1.0 billion in acquiring leasehold drilling rights from landowners in New York and Pennsylvania and in 2009 created more than 650 new jobs in Pennsylvania to explore for and develop Marcellus natural gas. The company expects to continue hiring at least 1,000 Pennsylvanians directly and indirectly annually for years to come. The company has no employee hiring plans in New York until the current Marcellus drilling moratorium is lifted.

Although New York Marcellus natural gas volumes will not be required to support the pipeline expansion announced today, McClendon said, "We look forward to the day when we can re-activate our Marcellus drilling program in the Southern Tier of New York using our advanced drilling and completion technologies, which will demonstrate our ability to safely and responsibly explore for and produce natural gas in an environmentally sensitive way, just as we do every day in Pennsylvania and in many other states across the country."

Chesapeake Energy Corporation is one of the leading producers of natural gas in the U.S. Headquartered in Oklahoma City, the company's operations are focused on the development of onshore unconventional and conventional natural gas in the U.S. in the Barnett Shale, Haynesville Shale, Fayetteville Shale, Marcellus Shale, Anadarko Basin, Arkoma Basin, Appalachian Basin, Permian Basin, Delaware Basin, South Texas, Texas Gulf Coast and East Texas regions of the United States. Further information is available at www.chk.com.

SOURCE: Chesapeake Energy Corporation

Chesapeake Energy Corporation
Jeffrey L. Mobley, CFA, 405-767-4763
Senior Vice President --
Investor Relations and Research
jeff.mobley@chk.com
or
Jim Gipson, 405-935-1310
Director -- Media Relations
jim.gipson@chk.com

I hope everyone who is concerned about this debate and has been following the statements from BOTH sides, reads and understands what this article represents. PLEASE question the motives and actions of BOTH sides of the issue. I believe the facts in this article along side the statements by NYC on drilling in the watershed speak for themselves, but let me point it out:

Remember when Chesapeake Energy said " Golly Gee, we will NOT drill for gas in the NYC watershed? It was HAILED by the antis as a blow to the pro drillers... Chesapeake... an example of a forward thinking and responsible company for NOT endangering the water supply of millions....

They were BOUGHT AND PAID FOR by NYC! NYC says "Come out against drilling in the watershed and we will open the door to the NYC natural gas market!"

"Marcellus shale exploitation is BAD, but here, build a 30 inch line and supply us with 800 million cubic feet a day of Marcellus gas from other states..."

PRICELESS!

Uncrowded, could you let us know when the rally is to protest Con ED and your beloved NYC government? I'll help you get the word out. ALSO, I can get you a woodstove pretty cheap (or any of your buds) since you can't possibly still want to heat with gas... Let me know...
 
Last edited:
I was skimming thru the latest TU magazine last night and saw an article about the
fracing chemicals showing up in the drinking water. So yeah, I'm afraid where all this
will put us in the future.
Didn't the US govt. state years ago how all the cars would be running gasless by now,
2010 ??

I think the plan is now to make them all wind powered which will work great in Chicago or on the open plains:) But seriously I just read the article and what I read was a stunning lack of detail. I can provide more details on the impact to the area in question with a google search. Once again I saw the call for clean energy mentioned in the article just not in my backyard.
 
I hope everyone who is concerned about this debate and has been following the statements from BOTH sides, reads and understands what this article represents. PLEASE question the motives and actions of BOTH sides of the issue. I believe the facts in this article along side the statements by NYC on drilling in the watershed speak for themselves, but let me point it out:

Remember when Chesapeake Energy said " Golly Gee, we will NOT drill for gas in the NYC watershed? It was HAILED by the antis as a blow to the pro drillers... Chesapeake... an example of a forward thinking and responsible company for NOT endangering the water supply of millions....

They were BOUGHT AND PAID FOR by NYC! NYC says "Come out against drilling in the watershed and we will open the door to the NYC natural gas market!"

"Marcellus shale exploitation is BAD, but here, build a 30 inch line and supply us with 800 million cubic feet a day of Marcellus gas from other states..."

PRICELESS!

Uncrowded, could you let us know when the rally is to protest Con ED and your beloved NYC government? I'll help you get the word out. ALSO, I can get you a woodstove pretty cheap (or any of your buds) since you can't possibly still want to heat with gas... Let me know...

I hate to break it to you, but the "article" you and Kilgour are both fawning over is a verbatim press release from Chesapeake (Business Wire is a press release distribution service). Are you guys now resorting to posting spin from the public relations office of the gas companies and trying to pass it off as as news??

C'mon FF & Kilgour, let's see some real FACTS!!! Like this one:

The union representing professional workers at DEC just urged Paterson to not allow gas drilling for at least another year to allow the agency to tighten the proposal.

Here's the link to the full story:Split over gas drill rules continues -- Page 1 -- Times Union - Albany NY

I know, FF, I know: WHAT DO THESE GUYS KNOW??? Must be a bunch on NIMBY union communists. In anticipation of your response, God Love You. (Seriously, I love your responses -- please keep 'em coming -- 655 views and counting!!)

Meanwhile, for the rest of us steeped in reality, write the Gov: A MAJOR DEVELOPMENT STRENGTHENS OUR CAUSE TO PREVENT GAS DRILLING | Catskill Mountainkeeper
 
I hate to break it to you, but the "article" you and Kilgour are both fawning over is a verbatim press release from Chesapeake (Business Wire is a press release distribution service). Are you guys now resorting to posting spin from the public relations office of the gas companies and trying to pass it off as as news??

C'mon FF & Kilgour, let's see some real FACTS!!!

Wait. Are you saying that it is NOT factual that Chesapeake, the sole company to say that they WOULD NOT drill within the NYC watershed, did not strike a deal with NYC to provide them with 800 million cubic feet of gas that will be liberated from Marcellus shale?

What spin can YOU put on THAT?

What "spin" are you alleging in the article?

NYC SAYS that drilling in the Marcellus is a risk to ground water... but if they REALLY believe that, they seem PERFECTLY ok with risking OTHER peoples' ground water. Shameful.

And YOU support them.

Which state has STRICTER rules for drilling than the ones proposed by New York? If there is none, is what you are saying then that NO gas drilling should be done in the United States?
 
Heres a news article I found. Seems like NYC thurst for gas out weighs its commitment to conservation efforts. What a suprise!!!!

Kilgour, I just did the math...

At $6 for a thousand cubic feet of gas
X 1000 = 1 million cubic feet = $6000
X 425 (which is Chesapeake's portion of the line)=

$2,550,000 per day in Chesapeake's pocket X 365=

$930,750,000 per year. A little increase in the price, yeah, a billion dollars a year.

I guess NYC made Chesapeake an offer they could not refuse, to say that they would not drill in the NYC watershed... ;)
 
EPA Submits Comments on New York State Marcellus Shale Natural Gas Drilling Environmental Impact Statement


Release date: 12/30/2009
Contact Information: (News Media Only) Bonnie Bellow (212) 637-3660, bellow.bonnie@epa.gov


(New York, N.Y. ) The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) today submitted its comments to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation on its September 2009 draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement (dSGEIS) on horizontal drilling and high-volume hydraulic fracturing in New York State. The draft environmental impact statement is required by the State Environmental Quality Review Act in order for the state to review and process permit applications for the horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing of natural gas bearing shales, including the Marcellus Shale. EPA’s comments were submitted during the public comment period on the dSGEIS, which closes on December 31, 2009.

EPA’s comments can be found at National Environmental Policy Act | Region 2 | US EPA
 
Back
Top